![]() BMD, bone mineral density CI, confidence interval FN, false negative FP, false positive TN, true negative TP, true positive. However, when estimating the overall sensitivity and specificity and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve plots, each 2 × 2 table was used in a different analysis (see Fig. (2010) study is reported twice for mandibular cortical width (MCW) (cutoff ≤3 mm and ≥4 mm) and for the panoramic mandibular index (PMI), since they reported 2 different 2 × 2 tables within the same cutoff range. Forest plot of different indices at different cutoffs (RevMan output). The bar chart shows that most of the concerns regarding applicability come from index test and patient selection domains. (2003) reported no significant differences in the values of sensitivity and specificity between nontrained general dental practitioners (GDPs) Figure 4. have been raised regarding the experience/training of the observers and the intra-and interobserver agreement when measuring panoramic indices (especially qualitative indices such as KI) (Jowitt et al. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |